tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Implementation of POSIX shared memory objects (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > While permitted by POSIX,
> > it would be significantly slower.
> which operations are significantly slower?  why?

Any reads/writes? Apart from greater file-system overhead (as opposed to
aobj), I think it can involve disks. :)

> YAMAMOTO Takashi

P.S. It seems there is a race condition in uao_resize() from patch, I will
fix it shortly.

Best regards,

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index