tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Final remote(4) / remote(9) API proposal



On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Robert Elz wrote:
I'd suggest that the API (and hence the name) should be independent of
any suggestion of transport technology (so should not involve IR) - there's
no reason a bluetooth remote, or a 802.15 remote, or anything else
(including 802.3, or RS232) should present a different interface to the
application, it is the function the application cares about, not the
signalling technique by which the user supplies that information to
the system.

It depends what you mean by application. As I have stated before in this thread, /dev/remote isn't intended for direct use by the application that processes commands, they instead should talk to the userspace daemon which handles keymappings.

Jared


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index