Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:34:20 +0400

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 21:36:24 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> Why do not start to fix file by file? I.e. you need to patch
> something in the xxx.c. Put the proper type changes and after this
> apply your change.

Right.  That's exactly the current change as you go policy that has
been referred to earlier.

SY, Uwe
-- 
uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost                       |       Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/          |       Ist zu Grunde gehen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

References:
- rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: Re: Including pf/altq in GENERIC?
Next by Date: rump ?
Previous by Thread: Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
Next by Thread: Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index