Re: rfc: POSIX conformance

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
From: christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:06:57 +0000 (UTC)

In article 
<5ec8ebd50808040047k7b1e1fb8r21dae500bee6b32c%mail.gmail.com@localhost>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko
><andy.shevchenko%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>> For stdio.h: vsscanf() (7.19.6.14), vscanf() (7.19.6.11), vfscanf()
>(7.19.6.9).
>These functions are defined under _NETBSD_SOURCE. Is it correct to put
>their under above definition?

Probably not.

christos

References:
- rfc: POSIX conformance
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
  - From: Patrick Welche
- Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
Next by Date: Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
Previous by Thread: Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
Next by Thread: Re: rfc: POSIX conformance
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index