Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> I think that we should do option 2 in the short term, option 4 if
> anybody has a good design with code, and a bit of option 1 for good
> measure.

Yes, exactly. [3] will cause problems on some archs, so we better not do it,
as Chris pointed out. [1] is free, so lets do it.

Martin