Salut, On Sun, 4 May 2008 15:08:41 +0100, Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote: >> Is that good enough? What if I am using 2 kernels, one with >> DIAGNOSTIC, DEBUG, LOCKDEBUG, and one without? > > The ABI is insensitive to DIAGNOSTIC and LOCKDEBUG these days. > Actually, there is a problem with KASSERT(mutex_owned(...)) on a spin > mutex but that > is a bug and I had forgotten about it. I'll file a PR. > > I don't know of problem areas with DEBUG but it's possible that some > exist. Well, it could however be a good idea to append the name of the config used in some cases, couldn't it? Such as 4.99.62-GENERIC, 4.99.42T-POOKA, ... Tonnerre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature