On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:09:31AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:46:07AM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote: > >> > >the name, but I'm forgetting what exact term we used) in an order > >opposite > >of the one in which we took them. ?? > > Except mutexes don't work that way. > > spl is only dropped (to the old spl) once *all* mutex all released. > So order of release doesn't matter. Ok. Good to know! So maybe there's an un-dropped mutex? If there's not an un-exited mutex, then the problem is then in whatever code we have that does spl manipulation the old way. Take care, Bill
Attachment:
pgpgGSKkh2mPw.pgp
Description: PGP signature