Subject: Re: second pass at the "store the path of the executable in struct
To: None <christos@zoulas.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/30/2007 20:21:21
> > - Uses reference counted paths and malloc().
> >   Should it use kmem_alloc() instead?
> 
> yes.
> 
> > - Are the names of the reference-counted path functions ok?
> > 
> > If I don't hear any objections, I'll commit it.
> > 
> > christos
> 
> at a glance, i tend to object.  i'll take a look closely in this weekend.
> 
> YAMAMOTO Takashi

my understanding is:

	- it isn't necessary for AT_SUN_EXECNAME.
	  (as exec is done by a pathname)

	- it isn't enough for procfs.  (rename, etc)

is it right?

YAMAMOTO Takashi