Subject: Re: second pass at the "store the path of the executable in struct
To: None <christos@zoulas.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/30/2007 20:21:21
> > - Uses reference counted paths and malloc().
> > Should it use kmem_alloc() instead?
>
> yes.
>
> > - Are the names of the reference-counted path functions ok?
> >
> > If I don't hear any objections, I'll commit it.
> >
> > christos
>
> at a glance, i tend to object. i'll take a look closely in this weekend.
>
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
my understanding is:
- it isn't necessary for AT_SUN_EXECNAME.
(as exec is done by a pathname)
- it isn't enough for procfs. (rename, etc)
is it right?
YAMAMOTO Takashi