Quoting KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara@kk.iij4u.or.jp>:
> I tried your slhci(4). As a result, umass(4) seems to operate enough.
> Because my environment is bad, it is not possible to test it though
> zyd(4) seems to operate, too.
> 
> And, I know 'slhci(4) at intio(4)' + ural(4) and umass(4) operated on
> x68k.  I think that I should replace our slhci(4). 
> ^^^^
> Do we have the problem?

  Thanks for testing.  isaki@ tested one version on x68k that had a bug, and
has
not had a chance to test with that bug corrected.  What revision chip do you
have?  The x68k board uses revision 1.2, but the Ratoc card is revision 1.5.

Mathew Orgass
darkstar@city-net.com