Subject: Re: UFS quota null pointer dereference
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org, releng@netbsd.org>
From: Bill Stouder-Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/26/2007 19:05:57
--kA1LkgxZ0NN7Mz3A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:54:54PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:57:04AM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> >=20
> > To be honest, my vote is to ignore LKM incompat here. I think it's grea=
t=20
> > that we strive for it, and in most cases I think we should. Here, howev=
er,=20
> > we are only talking about something that's used inside of ufs. I really=
=20
> > don't think anything outside of ufs uses it. Do ffs, ext2fs, and lfs us=
e=20
> > it, or do they defer to ufs code? i.e. they make ufs_foo() calls.
>=20
> The only uses of `struct dquot' fields are in `ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c'.  All
> other file systems use functions provided by this file.

My vote then is to just do it.

In the future, we should probably migrate the structure to that file.

Take care,

Bill

--kA1LkgxZ0NN7Mz3A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGgcYFWz+3JHUci9cRAqM4AKCVZ7r1ZaHhTCBaT/aJc5213LCyCwCeO8K9
+taI2DMYwfZnibfZwl59R70=
=6iQc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kA1LkgxZ0NN7Mz3A--