Subject: RE: GPT support still needed?
To: None <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: De Zeurkous <zeurkous@nichten.info>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/07/2007 16:12:22
Haai,
On Thu, June 7, 2007 15:59, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>>[snip]
> GPT is a nice, flexible partition table format -- much nicer and more
> flexible than BSD disklabel, and not really any more complex than it
> needs to be to overcome some of disklabel's limitations.
>
> Since we *already* use a foreign partition table format almost everywhere
> (since that's what disklabel is) it seems eminently sensible to switch to
> a more modern and flexible one. What disadvantage do you see to this?
Better show some code first, then talk about a possible solution. We
wouldn't want you to misinterpret our intentions...
Baai,
De Zeurkous
-----------
Friggin' Machines!
>
> Thor
>