Subject: RE: GPT support still needed? (was: RE: Recursive partitioning)
To: <>
From: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@twofifty.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/06/2007 13:58:39
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, De Zeurkous wrote:

> Haai,
>
> On Wed, June 6, 2007 18:44, der Mouse wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>
>> Perhaps, but phrasing it that way is misleading.  It makes it sound as
>> though the copy-on-write-ness will lift the limit, which it won't; it's
>> using wider-than-32-bit values that will, whether or not there is
>> anything like copy-on-write going on.
>
> The former implies the latter -- that why I've phrased it that way. Logic
>> verbosity.

In all honesty, I read that copy-on-write thing and thought you (De
Zeurkous) were a complete loon. Just as a user data point.

-- 
Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd@twofifty.com
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte