jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu writes:

> That's an unfortunate choice of terminology. it'S inviting confusion
> to say that a new approach does just what we did before, when it
> doesn't, and the details matter.

Is there, by any chance, a write up that describes the current
proposal?

A lot of the terminology here has been confusing me, but I thought
that was just because I've only recently come to this discussion. Now
I'm not so sure.