"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@NetBSD.org> writes:

> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:36:26 -0800
> Bucky Katz <bucky@picovex.com> wrote:
>> Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com> writes:
>> > I think it would be more accurate to say that "NetBSD-current makes
>> > no pretense of being usable in a commercial environment."
>> 
>> That sentence has four too many words at the end of it.
>
> I disagree.  I wouldn't suggest -current for mission critical
> applications but I have found it to generally be very usable.

I merely parrot what I have been strongly informed by NetBSD
developers who are responsible for destablizing -current and have
assured me that they will continue to destabilize.

By the way, there's nothing wrong with destabilizing -current as a
concept, but there are definitely wrong ways to do it.