Subject: Re: Please Revert newlock2
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Bucky Katz <bucky@picovex.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/20/2007 21:24:54
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com> writes:

> But putting the old SA code back into the kernel essentially means
> abandoning all of the newlock2 work,

Y'all keep trying to make this into an either/or. It ain't one of
them.


> Assuming the people trying to fix the ARM ports can get them to
> where your hardware works again, some kind of benchmark showing the
> degradation in the metrics you care about most might help show what
> needs to be done, and how urgently, to restore performance for your
> application.

I'm giving up. I'd like our stuff pulled up into 4.0-beta so we don't
have to deal with this.  Is that possible or are too many people upset
because I'm "rude"?

Either way's fine with me. If y'all no longer want to pull up our
stuff into 4.0 we'll just stick with the snapshot we got last before
newlock2.