Subject: Re: Renaming l_priority and l_usrpri
To: Pavel Cahyna <pavel@netbsd.org>
From: Mindaugas <unex@linija.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/19/2007 01:58:36
Pavel Cahyna <pavel@netbsd.org> wrote:
> The field names in struct kinfo_lwp should not change. This structure is
> AIUI supposed to stay compatible.
Yes, but I am not sure if we will avoid this. It is likely that we will need
to change it with scheduler abstraction changes and/or "LWPization" (p_pctcpu,
p_estcpu existence) - see Daniel's mail about scheduler API.

In any case, this definitly needs a consideration.

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas