On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:25:59PM +0200, Elad Efrat wrote:
> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> 
> > i still don't think it's a great idea to pass curproc everywhere
> > for aesthetic reasons.
> > 
> > given that it seems that the bug is annoying people,
> > how about postponing this discussion and fixing the problem using
> > curproc for now?  ie. a minimal fix.
> 
> we can do that.
> 
> (fwiw, since the solution may present an inconsistent kpi between the
> trunk and netbsd-4, we should probably decide on the correct way to fix
> this before the official release. :)

Isn't it a bit early to promise API stability of kauth?

Pavel