On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:51:02 -0700 Garrett D'Amore wrote:

 GD> I'm not a huge fan of XML, but your objections here sound like FUD much
 GD> more than any complaint, and I've not heard any better suggestions for a
 GD> file format that can be easily extended or support a variety of uses.

http://www.cabochon.com/~stevey/blog-rants/the-emacs-problem.html

:-) just to mention...

-- 
Mikolaj Golub