Subject: Re: control tool for amr(4)
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/29/2006 23:42:28 
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:01:27AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > I made a few more changes.. An uncompiled & untested diff is attached:
> > >
> > > - pass l->l_proc to bus_dmamap_load() so we don't need to double  
> > > buffer
> > 
> > Only do this if you vslock the buffer!
> 
> and vslock is fragile...

Hum. So we should probably stick with the double-buffer then ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--