On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:01:46 -0700, "Garrett D'Amore"
<garrett_damore@tadpole.com> wrote:

>

> Understood. I believe that there is a real need for a binary format that
> has a higher priority on efficiency. But it looks from above like you're
> already working on that.
> 
Is there?  I'm skeptical.  If I understand this properly, it's not
something one does very often; in the total system scheme of things, it
just doesn't matter.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb