Subject: Re: scheduler assertions
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Eric Haszlakiewicz <erh@nimenees.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/21/2006 09:58:17
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:44:18PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > Currently SCHED_ASSERT_{,UN}LOCKED actually do something when either
> > LOCKDEBUG or MULTIPROCESSOR are defined. Does anyone mind if I change
> > that to be a noop when !LOCKDEBUG?
> >
> > eric
>
> isn't it already a noop?
oh right. I was even just looking at the LOCK_ASSSERT definition, but
didn't manage to connect it together. Thanks.
eric