On Feb 21,  2:13pm, thorpej@shagadelic.org (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: IPSEC in GENERIC

| On Feb 21, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:
| 
| > I guess I'm partly confused becuase, from where I'm sitting, a common
| > header followed by IPv4 or IPv6-specific portions seems cleaner and
| > more in our spirit of "doing things right".
| 
| An even better way to do it would be one suggested by Matt Thomas --  
| IPv4 as a separate code base simply goes away, and instead takes the  
| mapped-address path through the IPv6 stack.

This would be ideal! Let's get mapped addresses working first please :-)

christos