Subject: Re: tape drive instrumentation round 2
To: None <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/17/2006 12:16:16
> I'm going to vote for "drive". We also include NFS info, which really 
> isn't "block" based. :-)

it isn't "drive" based either.

i vote for "iostat" and use it for network i/o as well, eventually.

otoh, i think just leaving it as diskstat and use it for tapes as well
can be a reasonable compromise for now. :-)

YAMAMOTO Takashi