On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:10:57AM +0100, joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote:
> 
> gcc2 supports a slightly different syntax though, which might be enough
> to implement the concrete function. I have not looked at the details
> though.
> 

I will have a look and see what we can do.  I really don't want to
wait an indeterminate time for gcc 4.1 (I am confident it will happen,
just not _when_ ;) and, of course, all our architectures must be
supported for this so gcc 2 semantics it is for the moment.

-- 
Brett Lymn