YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> i don't understand why it belongs to "security" node.
> after all, "security" is not a subsystem.

set-id processes dont dump core due to security reasons, so i thought
that putting this under the security node would be a good idea.

of course i'm not going to even bother arguing over this matter, and
if that's where people want it to be, it's fine with me.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat