Subject: kcont (was Re: Could this be a bug?)
To: None <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/13/2006 11:57:31
> I don't think anything in the tree uses kconts.  They were intended
> to replace the hand-coded continuations in the FAST_IPSEC code, and
> there's also a splice() implementation that uses them, but it's all
> been on hold for years because we can't establish a single ipl hierarchy
> across ports, and the generic kcont code doesn't work without that.
> 
> It has to happen.  I hope someone causes it to -- soon.

was there a concensus to move from softint to kcont?

YAMAMOTO Takashi