On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:50:46PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> > It would not surprise me, in the older code in 2.0 and even in
> > -current, if there were still some 32-bit related bugs or limits.
> 
> Isn't legacy code fun? :-þ

You told that you were trying 2.0, check the changelog carefully,
especially this entry:

sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_bmap.c                          patch

	Fix a silent truncation problem that could cause corruption with large
	FFSv1 file systems.
	[mycroft, ticket #1035]

I don't know what this means exactly, but I would be careful.

Pavel Cahyna