On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Bill Studenmund wrote:

> Then you are now adding that "holiness." Which is ok, except your
> arguement came across as having the "new holiness" (VOP interface  
> is for
> external uses only) as a pre-existing given. It obviously isn't, as at
> least Berkeley felt the existing mixing was fine. :-)

FWIW, I believe FreeBSD has cleaned up their VOP interface in a  
similar way.

-- thorpej