Subject: Re: Changing the I/O scheduler on-the-fly
To: None <juan@xtrarom.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/08/2005 10:22:50 
> YAMAMOTO please review it again (reload the URL).

- no one seems to allocate tbufq.

- don't assume that splbio() is a right way to protect bufq.
  how to protect bufq is up to each drivers.

- copying bufq_state is evil.
  (although i know that there is a driver which does it..)
  it's the reason why i suggested to refine bufq interface.

- don't assume BUFQ_SORT_RAWBLOCK.

- why disk_ prefix rather than bufq_ ?

YAMAMOTO Takashi