On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:34:18 +0900
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:

> > > - changes in conf/files are unnecessary.
> > 
> > Why? if we don't add all bufq_* files, we'll have to specify them
> > via "options BUFQ_foo", am I wrong?
> 
> right.  what's wrong with it?

I don't care too much, but just for not having to add those lines
into the kernel config :-)

> sorry, explaining how to implement the functionality in english
> likely takes far much time for me than implementing it by myself.
> please read the code. :)
> 
> i think that the best way is refining bufq interface
> to stop embedding bufq_state in softc.

Ok, sure I'll read the code... (that's what I have done until now).

Do you want to add the missing bits? (feel free to commit it BTW!)

I just want this feature in-kernel, and two brains are better than one!