Subject: re: Roadmap to compressed vnd(4)
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/17/2005 12:22:16
thanks for commiting the bulk of this.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, matthew green wrote:
> i don't want "vnconfig" to ever be removed. i don't see any point.
The point is consistence between vnd(4), vndconfig(8) and vndcompress(1,
not yet committed).
But as this is aparently such a big problem, i'll put that down on the
list now... seems NetBSD isn't about doing things the right way any more.
why isn't it wrong to remove a binary that people have used for over
10 years? what *harm* is there in leaving the old name? how is it
confusing?