On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:49:04 -0400
Allen Briggs <briggs@netbsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:08:17PM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > ac->ac_fib is a pointer? Sounds like some variant of intptr_t should
> > work.
> 
> The whole handling on ac_fib needs to be revamped.  It's currently
> storing a pointer and it needs to be holding an index or some such.
> I suspect I'm the developer that D'Arcy was referring to.  I am
> definitely delinquent in my work on that driver, but I still have
> motivation for getting it back to the top of my queue.

Cool.  I just commited another fix so now that section is all that is
left to do for basic portability.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@NetBSD.org>
http://www.NetBSD.org/