Subject: Re: splx() optimization [was Re: SMP re-eetrancy in "bottom half"
To: None <dbj@netbsd.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/06/2005 07:24:38
> As a tangential issue, last year I proposed documenting the required
> spl of simple_locks and pools in their initialization calls, with the
> possibility of later adding run time assertions of the constraint:
> 
>   http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2004/03/09/0001.html
> 
> Would this be a good time to update that patch and incorporate it?
> 
> Darrin

i like the idea as far as it's no-op unless defined(SOMEDEBUG).

YAMAMOTO Takashi