Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> writes:
> perry@piermont.com wrote:
>
>> Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> writes:
>> > I think options NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY has been superseded by
>> > options BUFQ_READPRIO
>> 
>> Well, that isn't described in options(4) and isn't in any config
>> files, so from the point of view of most users it might as well not
>> exist...
>
> Of course options(4) should be updated, but anyway "NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY"
> is not a good name. It isn't NEW anymore, and it might be superseded
> by other newer strategies like BUFQ_PRIOCSCAN in future.

How about I uncomment it and someone else renames it. :)

Perry