Subject: Re: ACPI-CA v. 20050309 status
To: Vincent <10.50@free.fr>
From: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/29/2005 13:01:09
--QBJnsLb0QyYEYRYK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:50:26AM +0200, Vincent wrote:
> Quoting Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>:
>=20
> >FWIW, the _PDC evaluation works with the new ACPI-CA code.  No pressure,
> >Kochi-san ;-)
>=20
> FWIW, I read, p. 260 of the ACPI doc: "The use of _PDC is deprecated in=
=20
> ACPI 3.0
> in favor of _OSC."

Yes, in ACPI 3.0.  ACPI 2.0-compatible DSDTs will have _PDC, and most
DSDTs you will find out there (including my laptop) will simply not
have _OSC.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--QBJnsLb0QyYEYRYK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQkk1ddgoQloHrPnoAQLgxggAh0vfj8+V5IbPx3tCcLxL2Z85Ojz/OlU+
1j+nMtZccTdMFlpjF+C+l4LgXPc8zfNFIcpANOHcQ8Wi2DvVhUsJGtOedF+B0jMj
AuOn0GR8tc/LygYdqd7vzqzJaDdOXNDLkDjO/dBkGSotZx+gnNwSZHaj59tGAtPL
Yzj8eCmUcCK2eTC0Lw4IClk9yNOqqT7MAwIM36UMaV19LcqC7JqkigMsGEhjIbMS
LRt1gQ6Iznk6T6BK2oa1kMSKIt05vOq14R8vz+tun9E7AZUVfUMVhdL6yZpCD56V
UyRXua99Pz3xRvvfZw11ic09vOu0OrJn+c0ivDPREurJe10XXLV6sQ==
=QJ3M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QBJnsLb0QyYEYRYK--