Subject: Re: fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750)
To: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/27/2005 08:40:32 
On Mar 27, 2005, at 1:08 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:

> A setsockopt for that would be great. I can do that if nobody  
> complain.

I am against making this new blocking behavior the default.  If this  
is allowed in *at all*, it should be "set a socket option to enable it".

-- thorpej