--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:33:26PM +0100, Felix Deichmann wrote:
> Quentin Garnier wrote:
> >>I have a tap driver (which I wrote) for 1.6.x.  I also note there's a
> >>tap driver in -current.  My options, as I see them, are:
> >
> >In pkgsrc, net/netbsd-tap.  It is the exact same as the one in -current
> >and -3, with the relevant hooks to make it work on 2.0.
>=20
> I still have a discussion about ethfoo, tun and tap in the kernel in mind:
> Ethfoo with tap and tun support, tun with flags (link0) to support tap,=
=20
> separate tap and tun???
>=20
> So which solution won the race? Which one will be used (in the future)?

Separate tap and tun.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQkH8bNgoQloHrPnoAQJkRQf/RaA7xMxkvyHl0q613BPVGl4eMAftP9Jt
HQhk76w5qHp/0oI551gp5Hxbf6baLrJua6185KMmKRVvL28bMVRk8RSR4DH02ged
HEj5GoemAsM2b32wDfxOA2CbYVwL6jZac4pXQb7GzNGCnUBxvS49PPQlOeyh/Fd1
5r0KGZ5m7QsnS+1PW85lzjuIPti/etfZ74IxxkTloNmCDCwU9xEyhgcYmhJHEyJS
0FbAQAFRfeAv3YQqkhH/M9gU8C56cnAhBU7/DkOJq5YI3yrFaaUw/OhJxvaalzZH
DledxEScy5o7lSIz9SMs9F68zWjwBJSe/cDRKx72oAjwqlXLFoJvgQ==
=Ub+W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--