Quentin Garnier wrote:
>>I have a tap driver (which I wrote) for 1.6.x.  I also note there's a
>>tap driver in -current.  My options, as I see them, are:
> 
> In pkgsrc, net/netbsd-tap.  It is the exact same as the one in -current
> and -3, with the relevant hooks to make it work on 2.0.

I still have a discussion about ethfoo, tun and tap in the kernel in mind:
Ethfoo with tap and tun support, tun with flags (link0) to support tap, 
separate tap and tun???

So which solution won the race? Which one will be used (in the future)?


Regards

Felix