>>>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 06:24:19 -0800 (PST),
	"Kamal R. Prasad" <kamalpr@yahoo.com> said:

> Ok -they are being ambitious in writing fds to disk
> and recovering them. I am not that ambitious. I expect
> the process that created a checkpoint to be still up
> and running when a recovery is initiated. And it is
> meant for program recovery -not process migration.

I pointed out that a problem of Dragonfly's implemetaion
is that its ability is limited (it cannot support migration).

And you say yours is more limited than Dragonfly's.
Well, That's not better, rather it's worse.
--
soda