My apologies for incorrect information....

>>>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:27:37 +0900 (JST),
	SODA Noriyuki <soda@sra.co.jp> said:

> This was because file pages occupied 7% ~ 26% (296KB ~ 1076KB) of RAM
> with the VM tuning parameters above:
> 			(pages)				     (%)
> -----------------------------------------------------   --------------
>  free	active	inactive	 anon	 exec	 file	anon exec file
>   114	  600	  312		 1036	    2	  133    101   0   13
>   198	  508	  321		 1011	    2	   74	  98   0    7
>   201	  506	  320		  964	    2	  118	  94   0   11
>   142	  570	  314		  870	    4	  269	  85   0   26
>   134	  576	  315		  929	    8	  213	  91   1   21

There was big mistake in this table.
The results of executable pages and file pages were swapped.
So, file pages didn't occupy that large memory with this benchmark,
it only used 0~1%.

Sorry.
--
soda