Subject: Re: m_defrag() addition
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/03/2005 09:54:33
--tgO4DUqb0GCKXXLG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:04:59PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>=20
> On Mar 2, 2005, at 1:17 PM, David Laight wrote:
>=20
> >Why not follow the semantics of realloc()?
>=20
> Yah, I think that's probably most reasonable.

I like this; maybe it should even be called m_realloc?

--
Dan.
--tgO4DUqb0GCKXXLG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCJkQoEAVxvV4N66cRAi05AJ4jy0jrbKFp7s8ykddzpk7DTtDmlwCgwm+E
DiCqajqIzikC4+FjAbRZrHQ=
=grCa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tgO4DUqb0GCKXXLG--