Subject: Re: Ideas on the audio framework
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/10/2004 15:55:37
--6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:29:23AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>=20
> i have one concern about removing the current 6 mulaw functions
> and replacing them wih almost certainly slower sequences of
> functions?  the platforms that matter are likely those that
> will never need anything but these (eg, sparc.)

Now that you mention it, me too. I'd like to see a benchmark on a slow
machine at a high sample rate.

	-is

--6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQbm45jCn4om+4LhpAQGJdgf+NelOsatnhNR3AgYcQdoAT3mr97kzQkyi
vatzkN7uRSFeDsQVtqIWE2d48fHIb567T6/DVIzbpdo886URW1tyyMvaEksT8pTY
7BdcK/J8oww7DxT9M6QHydERlhJmS0/cOc4tDCo7dStPfB85TyFT0/kT7BvJmAtI
rPMId1dOWC529p6FPohl5qqQF+2ceNWLKYIEP3017UbKJ3FsuAZb6TVC6xn/uXgq
uvgCR5L2zhq8BF1lH+kNAMS/A/Bh7iFG+Rf93ZnVcsQn3pYpXvyRpHo8ZF5kqu3Q
9aFBLvQH1I1PrBR99ONiMGvXsNQUGOstKLnsh1qLPbGwPFlGqM+96Q==
=MPjV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6zdv2QT/q3FMhpsV--