Subject: Re: Unicode support in iso9660.
To: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/19/2004 10:40:42
--Apple-Mail-1-175874226
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


On Nov 19, 2004, at 8:37 AM, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:

> AFAICS transcoding support is not very useful for FFS,
> where one can use whatever they want and there is no need
> for interoperatibility.

I disagree strongly with this.  If you don't adopt a standard encoding 
scheme for FFS, then you have to make individual entries 
self-describing in terms of what encoding they use.  That just seems 
totally insane.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>


--Apple-Mail-1-175874226
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBnj4uOpVKkaBm8XkRArPCAKCpJ1oIm3O6YV70ZRgZvDkr5ql/mwCcDPl2
F+0zKhZbl/FUv+NmZAWIQ6Y=
=1SCJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-1-175874226--