Subject: Re: Xen: uname -mp: i386/i386 -> i386/xen?
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/07/2004 11:26:42
--gneEPciiIl/aKvOT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:13:58AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 10:31:15AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 10:28:01AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> > > Would it be wise to make that "xen" for 'uname -m'?
> > > Or will it need adjusting in too many pkgs etc. which expect "i386"?
> >=20
> > Will there be any difference in userland between xen and i386?
>=20
> There isn't (or shouldn't be) any differences between amiga and mac68k ei=
ther,
> isn't it ?

There is, for some hardware support tools. (e.g., grfconfig, iteconfig)

	-is

--gneEPciiIl/aKvOT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQJtWUDCn4om+4LhpAQF7VAf/YH0TJbGq9jbHgViQASRKArzvpfOFuTHi
Mn9gdZxjq+b/azDkEAYoHqr05KOQCUaA7jzU1xjOIVKf91COva9hN9uwCjC8CIcj
4lEC4LtEOt4AQ7p+zVT9CNmWA/Ux7WOm6zBTY7POBmcjWpqAX8FlKT/dMEkJN60I
tGDKLwZlMYmR5akhjcfHzys23EsJeVzMKI0SyEemvayfr822rB6LpnlEZMHVk/7t
/F3D4AUjXevbMt/08CSkrVedEfkLEz7K9/EUMwmUfSTptkTPU0SXYRASsLS+3/yX
aj7Oxdg4+64vdCmoQYFVrealK79GZj+kr8qlPbpMTzz5YL784eQE2w==
=oYIk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gneEPciiIl/aKvOT--