--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:52:51PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > >honestly, i'm not sure why people hate to disable merging so much.
> > >merging don't solve kva or memory fragmentation.
> > >it only solve map entry fragmentation, which can be solved by
> > >vmem-like chunking.  am i missing some points?
> >=20
> > Because it's just wasteful and slow things down.  18K+ map entries
> > *must* have a performance hit.
>=20
> do you mean, things like vmem won't work?

Do we have code for vmem? We have code for merging, which only needs (what
seem) minor fixes. Seems like today the easiest thing to do is fix=20
merging.

Take care,

Bill

--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAIpZaWz+3JHUci9cRAsErAJ4+C1GW/R/eoPGJTDJs4o6iZpnUBwCfdwr4
3jfBL6uhYNSIu24AiXETWec=
=X63E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC--