At 03:24 PM 10/11/2003, Paul Kranenburg wrote:
>btw. would it be Ok on signal delivery, to just copy the actually used
>portion of siginfo_t (i.e. what's currently ksiginfo_t) to the signal
>handler's stack instead of all of the 128 "future expansion" bytes?

It's what I do powerpc and vax.

>I can only see potential confusion if a program that's compiled using
>a future version of siginfo.h is run on an older kernel, which would
>be something that's inadvisable anyway.

-- 
Matt Thomas                     email: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry              www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA              disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.