Subject: Re: fsync performance hit on 1.6.1
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/08/2003 07:31:35
--309evMHi/619oHyA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:32:04AM +0200, Daniel Brewer wrote:
> Our system is a lot more complex than just 1 image source and 1 image sin=
k.
> We have several other processes that may also require images. The file,
> although it may have its drawbacks, does allow multiple processes to use =
the
> same image data without replicating it all over the place.

How does SysV shm not provide that same capability?

And with semaphores, you can have the writer lock gracefully too...

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--309evMHi/619oHyA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/CquX9ehacAz5CRoRAvceAJ0Vlf6OY5iQkU53SEhT8Uyy1hV7/gCglJtR
PaPPkiyETcxdaiZ6/T5pJf4=
=4G+P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--309evMHi/619oHyA--