On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 07:30  AM, Todd Vierling wrote:

> I'm quite the bit surprised that we didn't go the 1 thread to 1 LWP 
> route
> before adding M:N as an additional feature.  Going 1:1 first would not 
> have
> meant "doing it wrong" or "doing it the non-NetBSD way"; it would 
> simply
> have meant "doing it in stages."  So why not insert a 1:1 code path as
> default now, to gain stability, and resurrect M:N in NetBSD 2.1?

Maybe if you hadn't given up your CVS commit privs, you could have 
tackled this problem yourself.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>