Subject: Re: select call implementation and threads
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: Kamal R Prasad <kamalrpr@in.ibm.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/29/2003 13:19:45
On Sun, 25 May 2003, malleswararao venkatanaga wrote:



> No, it actually is yielding. 1.6 doesn't have kernel-assisted pthreads. 
To
> the kernel there is only one thread. So the fact that one or the other
> runs means that there is some yielding going on.

If the user can bind each of the threads to a unique LWP -then his code 
will work fine. is there a reason why this cannot be done in NetBSD?
thanks
-kamal