--eNjIDde0W37E3OQP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday,  5 May 2003 at  3:06:25 +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> Wouldn't it make more sense to print a stack back trace with function
>> names?  That would give much more information.
>
> Only if debug symbols are available.

Yes, that would obviously be a requirement.

> And you still have a problem if the same panic occurs more than once
> in a function.

I think that's an easy enough one to avoid.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

--eNjIDde0W37E3OQP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+tb41IubykFB6QiMRAppkAJ9Rwjxo8JIEciRFS8NqdnxPJcsIKwCeNiJz
GLgnHialZLeKkDs7WPG/omw=
=nsf1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--eNjIDde0W37E3OQP--